2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ineffectiveness of light emitting diodes as underwater deterrents for Long-tailed Ducks Clangula hyemalis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many efforts have been directed at deterrence methods for bycatch, with good success for longline and trawl fisheries, but less effort has been focused on deterrents for gill-net fisheries (Løkkeborg 2011), with mixed results. For example, Hanamseth et al (2018) suggested that orange mesh reduced bird collision rates between birds and nets more than green or clear mesh, but Field et al (2019) showed that high contrast panels and lights did not reduce numbers of seabirds caught, and Cantlay et al (2020) provided additional evidence for the ineffectiveness of light-emitting diodes as deterrents. Acoustic pulses have been used to deter marine mammals (Waples et al 2013) and may hold promise for seabirds in some situations (Melvin et al 1999;McGrew 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many efforts have been directed at deterrence methods for bycatch, with good success for longline and trawl fisheries, but less effort has been focused on deterrents for gill-net fisheries (Løkkeborg 2011), with mixed results. For example, Hanamseth et al (2018) suggested that orange mesh reduced bird collision rates between birds and nets more than green or clear mesh, but Field et al (2019) showed that high contrast panels and lights did not reduce numbers of seabirds caught, and Cantlay et al (2020) provided additional evidence for the ineffectiveness of light-emitting diodes as deterrents. Acoustic pulses have been used to deter marine mammals (Waples et al 2013) and may hold promise for seabirds in some situations (Melvin et al 1999;McGrew 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) showed that high contrast panels and lights did not reduce numbers of seabirds caught, and Cantlay et al. (2020) provided additional evidence for the ineffectiveness of light‐emitting diodes as deterrents. Acoustic pulses have been used to deter marine mammals (Waples et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During trials, whereby visual alerts were attached to standard gillnets (e.g. high-contrast panels and LED lights), bycatch remained the same or even increased for long-tailed ducks when white flashing LED lights were used as a deterrent [ 12 , 18 ]. The Baltic Sea has very turbid water with a high sediment load, and even marine-adapted birds may have reduced visual capacity in these waters [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of birds bycaught annually in the North and Baltic Seas has been estimated at 100,000-200,000, with most bycatch occurring in the Baltic Sea (Žydelis et al, 2009). While technical measures are being effectively implemented to reduce bird bycatch for other fishing methods; for gillnets, none of the attempts thus far have been effective across a range of bird species (Melvin, Parrish & Conquest, 1999;Northridge et al, 2017;Field et al, 2019;Cantlay et al, 2020). To protect birds from bycatch, the best method would be to completely eliminate the gillnet fishery in vulnerable areas (Grip & Blomqvist, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%