2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic cyclic response of RBS connections with jumbo sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full floor model was created based on previous literature and the number of connectors gradually reduced while representative models were used [1]. The mesh seed was the same for both beam and shell elements with coincident nodes as connectors, ensuring convergence in composite/hybrid modelling [20,21].…”
Section: Connections Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full floor model was created based on previous literature and the number of connectors gradually reduced while representative models were used [1]. The mesh seed was the same for both beam and shell elements with coincident nodes as connectors, ensuring convergence in composite/hybrid modelling [20,21].…”
Section: Connections Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical fragility curves showed that RWS connections had significantly lower probabilities of exceeding certain inter-story drifts and collapse compared to RBS connections. Bompa et al (2023) assessed the cyclic performance of reduced beam section (RBS) moment connections with larger member sizes than allowed by current seismic provisions. Results showed that connections with beam sections up to two times the limits exhibited a stable inelastic response, but very large beam sections showed significant hardening and increased susceptibility to weld fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%