1955
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1298/68/3/306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic Heavy Particle Collisions Involving the Crossing of Potential Energy Curves III: Charge Transfer from Negative Ions of Atomic Hydrogen to Protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
59
0
1

Year Published

1958
1958
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
10
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower value is said to be derived from the experimental results of Szucs et al (1984) and Peart et al (1985), which lie close to the theoretical cross section predictions of Bates & Lewis (1955). However, Figure 2 shows that the lower recommended value of Dalgarno & Lepp is a factor of %3 times smaller than that of Bates & Lewis (1955). Also, these experimental results were carried out for collision energies in excess of 5 eV, which is of little relevance for early universe chemistry.…”
Section: Mutual Neutralizationmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lower value is said to be derived from the experimental results of Szucs et al (1984) and Peart et al (1985), which lie close to the theoretical cross section predictions of Bates & Lewis (1955). However, Figure 2 shows that the lower recommended value of Dalgarno & Lepp is a factor of %3 times smaller than that of Bates & Lewis (1955). Also, these experimental results were carried out for collision energies in excess of 5 eV, which is of little relevance for early universe chemistry.…”
Section: Mutual Neutralizationmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The higher value is said to be based on the results of Moseley et al (1970), but as can be seen in Figure 2, lies a factor of %4 below their results. The lower value is said to be derived from the experimental results of Szucs et al (1984) and Peart et al (1985), which lie close to the theoretical cross section predictions of Bates & Lewis (1955). However, Figure 2 shows that the lower recommended value of Dalgarno & Lepp is a factor of %3 times smaller than that of Bates & Lewis (1955).…”
Section: Mutual Neutralizationmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We take the value of k ± ∼ 10 −7 cm 3 /s for the H − +H + →H+H reaction [36][37][38] at 10 meV. Therefore, we derive the equilibrium abundance of H − : n(H − ) = ζn(H 2 )f DA /(k ± n + ) ∼ 5 × 10 −7 cm −7 .…”
Section: In the Ism Possible?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ρ e к о м б и н а[ц и я Сечение рекомбинации медленных положительных и отрицатель-ных ионов водорода было рассчитано в работе 177 . На рис 27. приве-дены кривые зависимости лога-рифма сечения рекомбинации (в единицах таг") от логарифма энер-гии столкновения для процессов: 180 .…”
Section: микроволновой методunclassified