2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(01)00104-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
198
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
198
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the compression resistance is larger for stockier specimens, but these specimens experience the greatest reductions in compressive resistance in the post-buckling range. This behaviour has been noted in earlier studies ([2]- [4]). In Figure 8, predictions of post-buckling resistance by Jain [2] are compared to the measured compression envelope curves.…”
Section: Initial and Post-buckling Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the compression resistance is larger for stockier specimens, but these specimens experience the greatest reductions in compressive resistance in the post-buckling range. This behaviour has been noted in earlier studies ([2]- [4]). In Figure 8, predictions of post-buckling resistance by Jain [2] are compared to the measured compression envelope curves.…”
Section: Initial and Post-buckling Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 2 show that ductility capacity was directly proportional to member slenderness; a trend which had previously been noted by other researchers (for example, [2] and [4]). The variation of ductility capacity with section width-to-thickness (d/t) ratio does not show a clear trend, probably because of the small range of values assessed, and the confounding influence of specimen strength.…”
Section: Displacement Ductility Capacity and Energy Dissipationsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations