2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequalities by energy sources: An assessment of environmental quality

Abstract: Energy demand is rising day by day, driven mainly by the development of countries. At the same time, uneven economic growth in countries is the prime cause of inequality in energy consumption. Keeping in view the worth of energy in the growth process, this study quantifies the impact of energy inequalities and trade on environmental quality over the period 1995-2018 for 57 countries. The Theil approach is used to quantify inter-and intra-regional disparities in five energy sources; oil, coal, natural gas hydro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar context, one of the recent studies by Yao et al. (2020) makes an attempt to quantify impact of energy inequalities and trade on climate quality for a sample of 57 nations over the period 1995–2018.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar context, one of the recent studies by Yao et al. (2020) makes an attempt to quantify impact of energy inequalities and trade on climate quality for a sample of 57 nations over the period 1995–2018.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inequalities in access to energy [6] may have a significant impact on social structure by contributing to increased social inequalities. Social status is one of the most important factors influencing energy consumption [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ visual analytics [31] to capture the leading trends, patterns, policies of energy use in EU-28. The critical impact of visualization techniques on analytical reasoning has been analyzed among others by Kielman et al [32], Keim et al [33], Yao et al [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%