1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-247x(90)90394-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequalities involving Bessel and modified Bessel functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The We have equality in (A.56) if and only if ν = 1 2 . The inequalities for K ν (x) can be found in [22], whilst the inequality for I ν (x) can be found in [23] and [27], which extends a result of [34]. A survey of related inequalities for modified Bessel functions is given by [7], and lower and upper bounds for the ratios Iν (x) I ν−1 (x) and Kν (x) K ν−1 (x) , which improve on inequalities (A.54) -(A.56), are also given in [22] and [33].…”
Section: A1 Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The We have equality in (A.56) if and only if ν = 1 2 . The inequalities for K ν (x) can be found in [22], whilst the inequality for I ν (x) can be found in [23] and [27], which extends a result of [34]. A survey of related inequalities for modified Bessel functions is given by [7], and lower and upper bounds for the ratios Iν (x) I ν−1 (x) and Kν (x) K ν−1 (x) , which improve on inequalities (A.54) -(A.56), are also given in [22] and [33].…”
Section: A1 Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. The upper bound holds because K ν (x) < K 1/2 (x) = π 2x e −x for all ν < 1 2 (see [5]). The lower bound follows from Theorem 2.1 and an application of the inequality Γ(x+a) Γ(x+1) > 1 (x+a) 1−a for 0 < a < 1 (see [4]).…”
Section: Results and Proofsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ismail and Muldoon [ 15 ] list many different bounds on , including those in ( 18 ) coming from formulas (6.7) and (6.22) in that article. For the second part, it is well-known [ 1 ] that the Bessel functions of the first kind may be expressed as hence, introducing , we obtain This function has previously been studied by Ifantis and Siafarikas [ 14 ], who proved various inequalities including their formulas (1.2) and (2.17) which imply the lower and upper bounds of ( 19 ). …”
Section: Survival Of the Secondary Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%