2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00492.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality and Crime: Separating the Effects of Permanent and Transitory Income*

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…"These results suggest that greater attention should be given to identifying the many factors affecting crime before one concludes that income inequality is the culprit". Dahlberg and Gustavsson (2008) argued that "income can be considered as consisting of two parts, one permanent and one transitory, and it is the changes in the permanent part rather than in the transitory part that affects crime rates". Their results "indicate that it is crucially important to separate the two effects".…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"These results suggest that greater attention should be given to identifying the many factors affecting crime before one concludes that income inequality is the culprit". Dahlberg and Gustavsson (2008) argued that "income can be considered as consisting of two parts, one permanent and one transitory, and it is the changes in the permanent part rather than in the transitory part that affects crime rates". Their results "indicate that it is crucially important to separate the two effects".…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 28 Relatedly, Kearney and Levine (2012) …nd that US teen birth rates are particularly high among minorities and in states with high income inequality. 29 The homicide rates are averaged over the three years 2004-06 to avoid small sample noise in small states. 30 See Cook and Ludwig (2011) for a discussion of the cost-e¤ectiveness of various levers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 At the broadest level, this connection manifests in a simple scatter plot of incarceration and homicide rates by states, shown in …gure 8. 29 It shows that homicide and incarceration rates tend to be much higher in the South than in the rest of the US. At the same time, the plot also shows that there is something special about the United States as a whole.…”
Section: Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this realm, certain theoretical contributions address the fact that law enforcement may also succeed by granting social transfers, because this influences the opportunity costs of crime (Benoit and Osborne 1995, Demougin and Schwager 2000. The empirical literature on the association between inequality and crime has in most contributions established a positive link between the two (see Dahlberg and Gustavsson 2008, Demombynes andÖzler 2005, Fajnzylber et al 2002, Whitworth 2012, although other results have also been found (see Kelly 2000 andChintrakarn andHerzer 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%