2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality, cooperation, and growth: An experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when the rich deliberately choose the low inequality setting, we expect that the poor engage in even more cooperation than in a low inequality setting fixed by nature. Hence, we expect the reciprocal behavior of the poor in the dictator treatment to lead to a clear negative effect of inequality choice on growth, while in the nature treatment we expect to replicate the neutrality finding of Sadrieh and Verbon (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, when the rich deliberately choose the low inequality setting, we expect that the poor engage in even more cooperation than in a low inequality setting fixed by nature. Hence, we expect the reciprocal behavior of the poor in the dictator treatment to lead to a clear negative effect of inequality choice on growth, while in the nature treatment we expect to replicate the neutrality finding of Sadrieh and Verbon (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We first check whether the neutrality result found by Sadrieh and Verbon (2002) is replicated, i.e. whether the inclination to cooperate by rich and poor individuals is neutral to the degree of inequality in the nature treatment.…”
Section: Experimental Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ostrom et al (1994), van Dijk et al (2002), and Cherry et al (2005 find that inequality leads to lower contributions, Chan et al (1996) and Buckley and Croson (2006) report a positive effect, and Chan et al (1999) and Sadrieh and Verbon (2006) no effect. With respect to heterogeneity in the marginal benefit from the public good, Fisher et al (1995) find that individuals with a high marginal benefit contribute more than those with a low marginal benefit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Note that there is a strand of literature on heterogeneous endowments in public good games, including Chan et al (1999), van Dijk et al (2002, Cherry et al (2005), Buckley and Croson (2006), Sadrieh and Verbon (2006). than the immigration requirement).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%