2013
DOI: 10.1177/1367493512468359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality in child mortality across different states of India

Abstract: The burden of social inequality falls disproportionately on child health and survival. This inequality raises the question of how wide this gap is, or what its relation is with the level of child mortality. Whether these disparities are increasing or declining with the development and how they differ from region to region or from state to state within the country needs to be looked into. As a measure of inequality and to compare the disparities between different states of India, concentration curves and indice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantifying geographic inequality in either levels or rates of improvement has been an important feature of many studies [15, 21]. In this vein De and Dhar [14] apply concentration curve approaches to the states of India and discover that the poorer states are more homogeneous, and Hosseinpoor and colleagues [16] test a variety of inequality measures and conclude that the majority lead to the same conclusions—spatial inequality appears robust to the common metrics used to measure it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying geographic inequality in either levels or rates of improvement has been an important feature of many studies [15, 21]. In this vein De and Dhar [14] apply concentration curve approaches to the states of India and discover that the poorer states are more homogeneous, and Hosseinpoor and colleagues [16] test a variety of inequality measures and conclude that the majority lead to the same conclusions—spatial inequality appears robust to the common metrics used to measure it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers and policy makers monitor progress toward SDG by evaluating mortality rates broken down by stratifiers, including wealth quintiles, rural/urban residence, maternal education, maternal age, gender of the child and geographic location (see https://www.equidade.org/indicators ). [ 5 ] Even outside SDG monitoring, equity based strategies to reduce under-5 mortality usually measure gaps in average mortality rates between large groups of births, such as births from different socioeconomic groups within the same country [ 6 10 ]. Studies have also documented significant under-5 mortality inequities across other demographic categories such as race, ethnicity, and geographic location [ 11 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively unfavorable international standing of India with respect to attainment of MDGs and SDGs in terms of under-five and neonatal mortalities mainly originates from the existence of substantial disparity in child survival and associated socioeconomic inequality in the country [18]. Factors contributing to the apparent stagnation and thereafter slowing decline of under-five mortality and its components include the lower socio-economic, cultural and health status of women and children in India [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%