2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality in social capital in Chile: Assessing the importance of network size and contacts’ occupational prestige on status attainment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
21
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We have created a multidimensional measure of individuals' SES by considering several factors or capitals: total monthly household income; occupational class, using the classification devised by the UK National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC); cultural capital, considering the maximum level of education obtained by some household members, as well as the number of books available in the household; and social capital, as the number of contacts that individuals have in higher SES occupations. Of the 13 occupations presented to respondents using the well-known Position Generator instrument (Contreras et al, 2019), four fall into this category (doctor, lawyer, university professor and director of a large company).…”
Section: Measuring the Socio-spatial Tanglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have created a multidimensional measure of individuals' SES by considering several factors or capitals: total monthly household income; occupational class, using the classification devised by the UK National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC); cultural capital, considering the maximum level of education obtained by some household members, as well as the number of books available in the household; and social capital, as the number of contacts that individuals have in higher SES occupations. Of the 13 occupations presented to respondents using the well-known Position Generator instrument (Contreras et al, 2019), four fall into this category (doctor, lawyer, university professor and director of a large company).…”
Section: Measuring the Socio-spatial Tanglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, this kind of thing would be the looting of the social upsurge of October 2019. Now, in Chile these critical levels are related to its current social system, which has originated a problem of economic and social inequality (Contreras, Otero, Díaz, & Suárez, 2019;Martínez, Hodgson, Mullen, & Timms, 2018;Méndez & Otero, 2018;Olavarría-Gambi, 2012;Rotarou & Sakellariou, 2017;Tejada, 2016), and with a phenomenon of transversal corruption of a majority sector of partisan politics (illegal financing of politics), of the company (collusion, fraud), ranging from economic "privileges" to economic criminality with significant degrees of impunity (Agostini, Willington, Lazcano, & Saavedra, 2017;Bel & Trillas, 2005;Borgias, 2018;Escobar-Farfán, Cardoza Cardoza, Vega, & Cañas, 2017) 3 .…”
Section: October 2019 Looting As Index Of Social Change In Chilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…La conclusión fundamental de este paradigma es que el estatus adquirido (nivel educacional y posiciones ocupacionales) es el factor principal para determinar el nivel de estatus de un individuo y, por tanto, este tiene mayor importancia que otros tipos de estatus como el adscrito (estatus de los padres o familia) (Lin 1999(Lin , 2001). Un estudio reciente que estudia este paradigma con datos de Chile es Contreras et al (2019).…”
Section: Marco Conceptualunclassified
“…L a importancia de las redes personales en el empleo y salarios obtenidos está ampliamente documentada. Hay artículos que ilustran cómo las redes influyen en las condiciones que permiten participar del mercado laboral (Stoloff et al 1999;Aguilera 2002;Luke y Munshi 2006), en los mecanismos para encontrar empleo (Mouw 2003;Caliendo et al 2011; Cingano y Rosolia 2012) y en los salarios obtenidos (Montersen y Vishwanath 1994;Sylos 2005;Delattre y Sabatier 2007;Long et al 2017;Contreras et al 2019). Si bien la economía ha abordado la utilización de las redes personales desde una perspectiva racional, esto es, en cuanto son la solución a un problema de asimetrías de información en el mercado laboral (Rees y Schultz 1970;Arrow y Borzekowski 2004), la influencia de las redes puede generar que individuos similares en características observables presenten diferencias salariales significativas (Montgomery 1991(Montgomery , 1994; Stupnytska y Zaharieva 2017) y que se produzcan problemas de eficiencia a raíz de individuos que obtienen empleos en sectores donde no tienen una ventaja competitiva (Bentolila et al 2010;Horvarth 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation