2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02386-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality in the last resort: how medical appraisal affects malpractice litigations in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They objectively and comprehensively studied the judicial behavior of judges using the judges' vote as the dependent variable and multiple factors at the case level and the judicial level as explanatory variables [ 29 ]. Liang et al (2020) combined ordinary multiple regression with mediating effect regression and studied the mediating effect of medical appraisal on compensation ratio with the latter's help, and analyzed the impact of case appraisal by professional knowledge institutions on litigation outcomes [ 30 ]. Second, by incorporating appropriate influencing factors, the evaluation method of judicial justice in a specific field is improved and specialized so that the theoretical model is more in line with its core characteristics ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They objectively and comprehensively studied the judicial behavior of judges using the judges' vote as the dependent variable and multiple factors at the case level and the judicial level as explanatory variables [ 29 ]. Liang et al (2020) combined ordinary multiple regression with mediating effect regression and studied the mediating effect of medical appraisal on compensation ratio with the latter's help, and analyzed the impact of case appraisal by professional knowledge institutions on litigation outcomes [ 30 ]. Second, by incorporating appropriate influencing factors, the evaluation method of judicial justice in a specific field is improved and specialized so that the theoretical model is more in line with its core characteristics ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to medical disciplines’ high professionalism and complexity, judges need to rely on professional technical assistance to adjudicate such cases. In order to ensure fairness and justice of verdicts, China has established a "dual-mode" structure of two third-party authentication organisations, the medical association identification and the judicial appraisal institution, which is similar to the system of single joint expert (SJE) [ 18 ]. The medical association identification and the judicial appraisal institution do not represent any of the parties and have a neutral status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, medical malpractice lawsuits are relatively rare in China. In 2014, 115,000 medical disputes were recorded in China, and only 17% of medical litigation cases were accepted by the court [ 8 ]. However, with a frequent incidence of workplace violence in hospitals [ 9 ], many Chinese medical workers have tend to regard patients as a genuine threat, and therefore, fear of malpractice is not merely an excuse for “economically motivated corruption” [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%