2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/804/1/012006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequivalent representations in the functional integral framework

Abstract: Abstract. An important feature of Quantum Field Theory is the existence of unitarily inequivalent representations of canonical commutation relations. When one works with the functional integral formalism, it is not clear, however, how this feature emerges. By following the seminal work of M. Swanson on canonical transformations in phase-space path integral, we generalize his approach to coherent-state functional integrals which in turn will lead to a simplified formalism which makes the appearance of the inequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The properly chosen measure for this integration d d−1 N o,i is Ω i . Note that this adjustment of the measure is not unusual, since it is known that canonical transformations, similar to those generated by N µ o,i , can result in a change of the path integral measure [14][15][16].…”
Section: E Path Integralmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The properly chosen measure for this integration d d−1 N o,i is Ω i . Note that this adjustment of the measure is not unusual, since it is known that canonical transformations, similar to those generated by N µ o,i , can result in a change of the path integral measure [14][15][16].…”
Section: E Path Integralmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Beside new results, we also collect and generalize some older ones, which are scattered in an incoherent fashion over a series of articles. Furthermore, we also wish to promote the concept of inequivalent representations in QFT which is not yet sufficiently well known among the path-integral practitioners [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%