2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-1101(02)00122-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertial currents in the northern North sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mid-depth local maximum in the absolute shear, |S|, is observed around the mean location of the MLD using the TDA or derived from the temperature profiles (Figure 9c). The local maximum in the shear at the location of the pycnocline is between 0.03 and 0.04 s -1 and is comparable to the vertical shear observed during the PROVESS experiment as shown by Knight et al, 2002). In the latter paper, these shears were found to be associated with inertial oscillations.…”
Section: Thermocline Detection Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A mid-depth local maximum in the absolute shear, |S|, is observed around the mean location of the MLD using the TDA or derived from the temperature profiles (Figure 9c). The local maximum in the shear at the location of the pycnocline is between 0.03 and 0.04 s -1 and is comparable to the vertical shear observed during the PROVESS experiment as shown by Knight et al, 2002). In the latter paper, these shears were found to be associated with inertial oscillations.…”
Section: Thermocline Detection Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The dominant processes in de-stratification are the (turbulent) heat and momentum flux by wind and (breaking) waves at the seas surface and shear-induced turbulence by bottom friction at the seabed. In general, turbulent fluxes at the thermocline are small except under certain conditions, such as breaking of internal waves which are generated by tide-topography interaction (Rippeth, 2005;van Haren et al, 1999) and shear generated by inertial currents following strong wind-forcing events (Knight et al, 2002;MacKinnon and Gregg, 2005;Rippeth, 2005;van Haren, 2000). Enhanced shear and mixing occurs when wind-stress, the bottom shear-stress (which is mostly tidally-driven), and the inertial shear-vector all are aligned (Burchard and Rippeth, 2009).…”
Section: Seasonal Thermoclinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the interface between the surface and bottom mixed layer, turbulence levels are reduced and vertical fluxes are small, except under certain conditions. For instance, vertical fluxes can be generated by internal waves breaking at the interface, when generated by tidal flows forced over topography (Rippeth, 2005;van Haren et al, 1999) or shear generation across the interface by inertial currents following a strong wind forcing event (Knight et al, 2002;MacKinnon and Gregg, 2005;Rippeth et al, 2005;van Haren, 2000). Periods of enhanced shear can lead to shear instability and diapycnal mixing as the system appears to be only marginally stable (van Haren et al, 1999).…”
Section: Climatology and Seasonal Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although measurements of inertial currents in deep water [ Weller , 1982] have demonstrated that they are generally surface trapped and can be represented by single point models containing specified dissipation and horizontal shear terms, in coastal regions a number of authors [ Rippeth et al , 2002; Knight et al , 2002; Orlic , 1987; de Young and Tang , 1990; Font , 1990] showed that there were near‐inertial currents throughout the water column with a 180° phase change in the current through depth. The inertial oscillations at depth arose through the presence of a coastline which inhibited the presence of inertial oscillations at the coastal boundary, and the inertial energy propagated downward and offshore from the coastline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%