2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02658-4_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INFAMY: An Infinite-State Markov Model Checker

Abstract: Abstract. The design of complex concurrent systems often involves intricate performance and dependability considerations. Continuous-time Markov chains (CTMCs) are a widely used modeling formalism, where performance and dependability properties are analyzable by model checking. We present INFAMY, a model checker for arbitrarily structured infinite-state CTMCs. It checks probabilistic timing properties expressible in continuous stochastic logic (CSL). Conventional model checkers explore the given model exhausti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental evaluation is an extended and revised version of [14]. As in Subsection 3, we consider three different strategies for error-estimation, namely the Uniform chain based, Layered chain based, and the finite state projection (FSP) method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental evaluation is an extended and revised version of [14]. As in Subsection 3, we consider three different strategies for error-estimation, namely the Uniform chain based, Layered chain based, and the finite state projection (FSP) method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have implemented INFAMY [14], a model checker for infinite Markov (reward) models. INFAMY supports probabilistic programs in a guarded command language with unbounded integers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, not discarding states allows for a simpler representation of state-to-state transitions. It also allows one to handle nested CSL formulas [Hahn et al 2009;Spieler et al 2014], for which FAU does not seem appropriate. The reason is that, when discarding a state, the information about which subformulae of the CSL formula under consideration are fulfilled is lost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 −5 ). It is, however, also possible to bound the number of iterations by considering the sequence of the transition ratesλ in a similar way as Hahn et al [17].…”
Section: A Main Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%