Objective: To review the scientific findings on the baby-led weaning method (BLW) in
the context of complementary feeding.Data sources: Two independent examiners searched the Medical Literature Analysis and
Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE)/PubMed database in August 2016. No
time-period was defined for the publication dates. The following descriptors
were used: “baby-led weaning” OR “baby-led” OR “BLW”. Inclusion criteria
were: original studies that were available in English, and which addressed
the BLW method. Exclusion criteria were: references in other languages,
opinion articles and literature reviews, editorials and publications that
did not elaborate on the intended subject. Of the 97 references identified,
13 were included in the descriptive synthesis.Data synthesis: The BLW group of babies, when compared to the traditional eating group, were
less prone to being overweight, less demanding of food, and ate the same
foods as the family. The number of choking episodes did not differ between
groups. Mothers who opted for the implementation of BLW had higher levels of
schooling, held managerial positions at work, and were more likely to have
breastfed until the sixth month of the child’s life. Concerns were raised
about messes made during meals, wasting food, and choking, but most of the
mothers recommended adopting the method. Health professionals were hesitant
to indicate this method.Conclusions: BLW was recommended by mothers who followed the method with their own
children. However, concerns have been reported, which, coupled with
professionals’ fears about the inability of infants to self-feed, reflect a
lack of knowledge about the method.