2021
DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant functional networks are modulated by state of consciousness and circadian rhythm

Abstract: Functional connectivity networks are valuable tools for studying development, cognition, and disease in the infant brain. In adults, such networks are modulated by the state of consciousness and the circadian rhythm; however, it is unknown if infant brain networks exhibit similar variation, given the unique temporal properties of infant sleep and circadian patterning. To address this, we analyzed functional connectivity networks calculated from long-term EEG recordings (average duration 20.8 hours) from 19 hea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In multiple studies, children with IS exhibited stronger cross-correlation FCNs compared with healthy controls ( 41 , 45 , 46 ). This held true when the FCNs were measured in both wakefulness and sleep; however, FCNs measured during sleep had stronger connections than those measured during wakefulness, for both children with IS and healthy controls ( 41 , 63 ). These cross-correlation networks were found to be individualized, rather than stereotyped within a subject group, ( 64 ), and they had high test-retest reliability, with stable networks produced from as little as 150 s of EEG data ( 45 , 46 , 63 ).…”
Section: Computational Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In multiple studies, children with IS exhibited stronger cross-correlation FCNs compared with healthy controls ( 41 , 45 , 46 ). This held true when the FCNs were measured in both wakefulness and sleep; however, FCNs measured during sleep had stronger connections than those measured during wakefulness, for both children with IS and healthy controls ( 41 , 63 ). These cross-correlation networks were found to be individualized, rather than stereotyped within a subject group, ( 64 ), and they had high test-retest reliability, with stable networks produced from as little as 150 s of EEG data ( 45 , 46 , 63 ).…”
Section: Computational Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We estimated the brain network metrics based on the scalp sensor-based EEG connectivity matrix. Although often performed in source space, due to a small number of channels (Lantz et al, 2003) we did it rather in sensor space similar to previous studies (Stam et al, 2007;Zeng et al, 2015;Chai et al, 2019;Sun et al, 2019;Mitsis et al, 2020;Smith et al, 2021). In the discussion, we mention and discuss limitations associated with the estimation of graph metrics in sensor space.…”
Section: Network Measurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We estimated the brain network metrics based on the scalp sensor-based EEG connectivity matrix. Although often performed in source space, due to a small number of channels (Lantz et al, 2003) we did it rather in sensor space similar to previous studies (Chai et al, 2019;Mitsis et al, 2020;Smith et al, 2021;Stam et al, 2007;Sun et al, 7 2019; Zeng et al, 2015). In the discussion, we mention and discuss limitations associated with the estimation of graph metrics in sensor space.…”
Section: Network Measurementioning
confidence: 90%