2010
DOI: 10.1093/shm/hkq042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant Mortality Variations, Feeding Practices and Social Status in London between 1550 and 1750

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Appleby, ‘Nutrition and disease’; Champion, London's dreaded visitation , pp. 81–97; Razzell and Spence, ‘History’; Newton, ‘Infant mortality variations’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appleby, ‘Nutrition and disease’; Champion, London's dreaded visitation , pp. 81–97; Razzell and Spence, ‘History’; Newton, ‘Infant mortality variations’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further possible source of bias in the burial records may result from the practice of sending infants away from their homes to be wet-nursed, which was common in wealthy families and for abandoned infants (Finlay, 1981;Newton, 2011). Nursing infants who died in the care of their wet-nurses or during the journey from London were usually buried and recorded in the local parish, rather than in the city (Fildes, 1988).…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would lead to an underestimation of the number of infant deaths relative to births. Information on the prevalence of wet-nursing during different periods is scarce, but there is some evidence to suggest that the practice was already far less common by the middle of the eighteenth century than in earlier periods (Newton, 2011). The number of nurse-children buried in parishes around London declined steeply in the early eighteenth century reaching very low numbers by the 1750s (Fildes, 1988) suggesting either that living conditions had improved substantially, or more likely that fewer infants were being sent from London for wet-nursing by the mid-eighteenth century.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations