2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: The Danish National Cohort Study 1995–2006

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
173
4
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
24
173
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with systematic reviews and cohort studies which indicated similar or even better neonatal outcomes for singletons born after cryopreservation of the embryo compared to singletons born after IVF/ICSI with fresh embryo transfer [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This finding is in line with systematic reviews and cohort studies which indicated similar or even better neonatal outcomes for singletons born after cryopreservation of the embryo compared to singletons born after IVF/ICSI with fresh embryo transfer [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In fresh donor cycles, recipients have hormone levels more comparable to those in a natural conception cycle, which may in part explain the improved rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live births [38], as well as lower rates of LBW, SGA [8], and preterm birth [5]. Results of clinical studies and meta-analyses of IVF pregnancies indicate the risks for SGA, preterm birth, LBW, antepartum hemorrhage, and perinatal mortality are significantly reduced with frozen compared to those with fresh embryo transfers [2,[39][40][41][42]. The risk of prenatal bleeding, placental complications, and postpartum hemorrhage has been shown to be higher in both subfertile and IVF pregnancies compared to those conceived spontaneously [43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale to use so-called segmented-ART treatment has been the avoidance of iatrogenic complications related to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), such as, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and premature progesterone rise [3,5]. In the latter case, deferring fresh transfer, freezing all embryos, and transferring frozen-thawed embryos in a subsequent physiologically normal cycle has been shown to potentially result in improved embryo implantation and placentation and consequently improved perinatal and neonatal outcomes [1][2][3][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, segmented treatment also has complications, i.e., the management of an increased number of confounding variables and an increase in the treatment duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%