2017
DOI: 10.30958/ajss.5-1-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant-sibling Interactions: A Window to the Intergenerational Transmission of Caregiving Behaviors

Abstract: Infant-sibling interactions were examined as a mechanism for understanding the development of responsive caregiving behaviors in older siblings. Twelve-month-old infants (M = 12.5 months), their 3-to 10-year-old siblings (M = 5 years), and their mothers (n = 26 infant-sibling-mother triads) were observed during separate 20minute infant-sibling and infant-mother interactions. Responsiveness to infant behaviors was analyzed using seven mutually exclusive, non-culture-specific vocal and non-vocal categories and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that it is uncertain to what extent and in what way the age of the child interlocutors may affect the quality of the focal children's linguistic environment. In fact, although Hoff-Ginsberg and Krueger (1991) showed that children under the age of six years produced less responsive language, others have shown that it is not only the age of the child interlocutors but also the time that the children dedicate to caring for their siblings which may impact the language that they direct towards the young child (Walker, 2018). The impact that sibling care can have on the language of the young interlocutors is particularly relevant, as other studies (Alcalá et al, 2014;Vogt, Mastin, & Aussems, 2015) have shown that it is precisely in populations that have characteristics similar to those of the impoverished semi-rural area where children tend to take care of their younger siblings, even from the age of four years (Maynard, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that it is uncertain to what extent and in what way the age of the child interlocutors may affect the quality of the focal children's linguistic environment. In fact, although Hoff-Ginsberg and Krueger (1991) showed that children under the age of six years produced less responsive language, others have shown that it is not only the age of the child interlocutors but also the time that the children dedicate to caring for their siblings which may impact the language that they direct towards the young child (Walker, 2018). The impact that sibling care can have on the language of the young interlocutors is particularly relevant, as other studies (Alcalá et al, 2014;Vogt, Mastin, & Aussems, 2015) have shown that it is precisely in populations that have characteristics similar to those of the impoverished semi-rural area where children tend to take care of their younger siblings, even from the age of four years (Maynard, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cabe señalar que resulta incierto en qué medida y de qué modo puede incidir la edad de los niños interlocutores en la calidad del entorno lingüístico de los niños foco. En efecto, si bien Hoff-Ginsberg y Krueger (1991) mostraron que los niños menores de seis años producían un lenguaje menos responsivo, otros han mostrado que no es únicamente la edad de los niños interlocutores, si no también el tiempo que los niños dedican al cuidado de sus hermanos, aquello que puede impactar en el lenguaje que le dirigen al niño pequeño (Walker, 2018). La incidencia que el cuidado de hermanos puede tener en el lenguaje de los niños interlocutores resulta particularmente relevante en tanto que otros trabajos (Alcalá et al, 2014;Vogt, Mastin, & Aussems, 2015) han mostrado que justamente en poblaciones que tienen características similares a las de la zona semirural empobrecida, los niños suelen cuidar de sus hermanos menores, incluso desde los cuatro años (Maynard, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations