1999
DOI: 10.1097/00005721-199911000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant Sleep Position

Abstract: Because side sleeping position was observed in the majority of infants, and one-third of the nurses queried disagreed with the AAP recommendations, education of nurses about Sudden Infant Death Syndrome prevention through "Back to Sleep" is still necessary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some had less awareness of sleep positions and had trained nothing to the parents of preterm neonates. Peeke et al (1999) reported that 97% of nurses were informed of AAP guidelines but only 67% of them agreed with them whereas 29% of them used the supine position. They observed that the vast majority of nurses use the side-lying position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some had less awareness of sleep positions and had trained nothing to the parents of preterm neonates. Peeke et al (1999) reported that 97% of nurses were informed of AAP guidelines but only 67% of them agreed with them whereas 29% of them used the supine position. They observed that the vast majority of nurses use the side-lying position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study reported that while 97% of nurses knew the AAP recommendations for safe sleep, only 67% agreed, and only 29% of the infants were found lying in the supine position, compared with 55% side-lying and 16% in the prone position. 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%