PsycEXTRA Dataset 1954
DOI: 10.1037/e450962004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infantry OCS evaluations and combat performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Katter & Holmen (1954) study, peer ratings of leadership out-performed all other measures in the prediction of combat performance in the Korean War (r = .34). For comparison, ratings by superiors were only weakly correlated with performance in combat (r = .12).…”
Section: Peer Ratings Of Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Katter & Holmen (1954) study, peer ratings of leadership out-performed all other measures in the prediction of combat performance in the Korean War (r = .34). For comparison, ratings by superiors were only weakly correlated with performance in combat (r = .12).…”
Section: Peer Ratings Of Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To illustrate, Yongling, Levine, Mocharmuk, & Weston (1977) reviewed studies conducted in the United States Army that focused on predicting the combat behavior of the single soldier. Of 31 studies, five were concerned with the prediction of leadership behavior, and one of them, a study conducted by Katter & Holmen (1954), considered peer evaluations of leadership as predictors of real combat performance.…”
Section: Peer Ratings Of Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%