2023
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infants and toddlers leverage their understanding of action goals to evaluate agents who help others

Abstract: This paper has been accepted and is in press at Child Development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the choice test was more socially directed at the toddler than were the final events; we take the choice test as a measure of social engagement with the different agents, and the final event looking times as a measure of interest in or processing of each of the full final events. These interpretations are consistent with past research in which infants and toddlers looked longer at prosocial agents, but attended equally to events in which agents engaged in prosocial and antisocial actions (Hamlin et al, 2010 ; Hamlin & Wynn, 2011 ; Woo & Spelke, 2023a , 2023b ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the choice test was more socially directed at the toddler than were the final events; we take the choice test as a measure of social engagement with the different agents, and the final event looking times as a measure of interest in or processing of each of the full final events. These interpretations are consistent with past research in which infants and toddlers looked longer at prosocial agents, but attended equally to events in which agents engaged in prosocial and antisocial actions (Hamlin et al, 2010 ; Hamlin & Wynn, 2011 ; Woo & Spelke, 2023a , 2023b ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted Experiments 2 and 3 using online methods via a video conference software (Zoom). Because we could not elicit reaching behavior to physical objects over video calls, we instead probed toddlers’ evaluations by measuring how long toddlers chose to look at the two helpers using a preferential looking test, following prior research that used this measure to assess infants’ social evaluation in traditional laboratory settings (Hamlin & Wynn, 2011 ; Hamlin et al, 2010 ) and more recently in online experiments with infants and toddlers (Woo & Spelke, 2023a , 2023b ).…”
Section: Experiments 2: Further Evidence Of Evaluations Based On Agen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, infants chose between an imitative helper and a mere imitator, and consistently selected the helper. In a study from Spelke's own laboratory led by her former student Brandon Woo (Woo & Spelke, 2023), 8-month-olds were led to infer that an agent's goal was one of the two possible options, either to open a specific box or to obtain a specific toy. Subsequently, one agent facilitated the goal they inferred the agent to have, whereas the other agent facilitated the other goal; critically for the present purposes, in one condition the helpful agent was less imitative.…”
Section: Evidence Infants' Preference For Helpers Cannot Be Explained...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, infants chose between an imitative helper and a mere imitator, and consistently selected the helper. In a study from Spelke's own laboratory led by her former student Brandon Woo (Woo & Spelke, 2023), 8-month-olds were led to infer that an agent's goal was one of the two possible options, either to open a specific box or to obtain a specific toy. Subsequently, one agent facilitated the goal they inferred the agent to have, whereas the other agent facilitated the other goal; critically for the present purposes, in one condition the helpful agent was less imitative.…”
Section: Evidence Infants' Preference For Helpers Cannot Be Explained...mentioning
confidence: 99%