200Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc | Braz J Cardiovasc SurgRev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2013;28(2):200-
INTRODUCTIONMedian sternotomy is the technical approach most used in the surgical treatment of cardiopathies. Mediastinitis is a severe complication leading to an increase in hospital costs, morbidity and mortality [1,2]. The treatment, however, has progressed with new antibiotics, along with technical and surgical care.Postoperative incidence of mediastinitis ranges from 0.5% to 5% [3][4][5]. However, mortality associated with such surgical complications, even after appropriate treatment, is extremely high, ranging between 14% and 47% [1,6,7]. Several studies have identified risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, reoperation, smoking, prolonged operative time, bilateral use of the internal thoracic artery, and postoperative bleeding [4,5,8,9].Surgical management of postoperative mediastinitis counts on several techniques described in the literature [5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Treatment may include single-or multiple-stage procedures, with or without the use of muscle or omental flap [11,12,18]. Therapeutic modalities encompass two options: preconditioning of the wound, leaving the wound open for a better cleaning and mediastinal drainage with dressings, or using one of the several closure techniques available. Singlestage closure shows a recurrence rate between 5%-50% in comparison to two-stage closure whose rate ranges from 2%-30% [19,20], however the long term exposure of the mediastinum enhances the morbidity.The present study aims to compare inpatient mortality rate from surgical debridement followed by primary wound closure with that from surgical debridement with closure after preconditioning of the wound.
METHODSFrom January 2000 to December 2008, at Hospital de ClĂnicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), southern Brazil, 3,166 cardiac surgeries were performed in adults using median sternotomy and extracorporeal circulation (ECC). A historical cohort of patients who had postoperative mediastinitis was followed up during hospital stay after the first surgery and reintervention(s). From 2007, we implemented the protocol of preconditioning of the wound for all patients. Data were abstracted from the patient's medical records. The entire patient sample that showed mediastinitis during this period was identified through the Cardiovascular Surgery Division records in combination with those from the Commission on Hospital Infection Control (CCIH) of HCPA. Mediastinitis was defined as deep surgical wound infection with clinical and microbiologic evidence of compromised retrosternal space. During this period, 49 patients developed mediastinitis, an incidence of 1.55%. Of these, 43 patients met the classification criteria (El Oakley) [3] as type III or IV and were included in the study.The diagnosis of mediastinitis was based on physical examination and laboratory tests. Three diagnostic criteria were elected during initial evaluation: sternal instability; leukocytosis of more than 15,000; and wound secretion. All patients w...