Infection Control in Dental Clinic and Laboratory

Kumari, Kavita; Subhash, Andey Venkata

doi:10.5958/2347-6206.2014.00009.0

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The potential risk of contamination with the aerosols and pathogens exists during all dental procedures encompassing trimming, finishing, and polishing, so there is a need for appropriate disinfection techniques which act efficiently on a broad spectrum of microorganisms and are cost-effective, rapid and safe for human's health. [2][3][4][5] The disinfection of the dental impressions is strongly recommended by the health policymakers such as the Centre for Disease Control (CDC), the American Dental Association (ADA) and the British Dental Association (BDA) to prevent the possible transmission of infectious diseases and cross-contamination. [6][7][8] Although guidelines for sterilization and disinfection have been established by these organizations, investigations have shown that proper practice is not always followed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antimicrobial Activity of Cold Plasma Treatment on Acrylic Denture Bases: An In Vitro Evaluation

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Cross-contamination between dental office and prosthetic laboratories is of utmost importance. The dental prosthesis could harbor tones of microorganisms harmful to health staff. It has been estimated that more than 60% of the prostheses delivered to clinics from laboratories or vice versa are contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms. Several disinfection methods and chemicals have been proposed for sanitizing prostheses. Cold plasma, or nonthermal plasma, has been introduced as a new method in medical equipment disinfection. The current study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effect of cold plasma and the routinely used alcohol-based impression disinfectant ASEPTOPRINT® on disinfecting dentures. Methods: In this experimental study, 30 maxillary complete dentures were used as the microbial source. Dentures were randomly divided into 3 groups: (1) cold plasma treatment for 30 seconds, (2) cold plasma for 60 seconds, (3) ASEPTOPRINT® spray. Microbial culturing was taken before and after disinfection in each group on both Blood Agar plates and Soborou Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates. After 48 hours incubation at 37°C, the number of colonies was counted using a digital colony counter and differences between the groups were analyzed. Results: A significant reduction in microbial colonies was observed after using all disinfection methods. ASEPTOPRINT® spray showed more antimicrobial effects comparing to cold plasma. Conclusion: The antimicrobial effect of ASEPTOPRINT® spray solution is more than cold plasma application on both microbial and fungal microorganisms. The time of plasma application was not accompanied by any significant differences in the results.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%