1995
DOI: 10.1177/107834589500200105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection Control in Jails and Prisons: A Two-Tiered Intervention

Abstract: A two-tiered intervention is proposed to address the high prevalence rate of infectious disease among inmate populations and the communities from which they come. A facilitative climate is created (first tier) within which to implement an infection control program (second tier) geared specifically to the needs of an inmate population and its community. The program is based on collaboration between public health and corrections organizations. Targeted groups and intervention components are outlined. Historical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the pandemic lockdowns forced community re-entry programs to reduce services. These challenges, moreover, emerged against a background of poor infection control in detention facilities and limited opportunities for incarcerated individuals to be heard on issues regarding their health (33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the pandemic lockdowns forced community re-entry programs to reduce services. These challenges, moreover, emerged against a background of poor infection control in detention facilities and limited opportunities for incarcerated individuals to be heard on issues regarding their health (33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this, concrete efforts are needed to streamline the coaching process for prisoners, especially those with a high level of recidivism, so that the correctional goals can be achieved in accordance with what the Correctional Institution aspired to. [ Young, 1995]…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%