1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00192473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection in massive bone allografts sterilised by radiation

Abstract: Massive bone allografts sterilised by radiation have been used in our hospital since 1985. The 164 consecutive reconstructions which we carried out before December 1990 were in equal part for tumour resections and revision arthroplasties associated with major bone defects. The allografts were used as intercalary or composite graft-prosthesis reconstructions. Fourteen (8.5%) skin sloughs or infections occurred, all but one after operations for malignant tumours. The grafts never appeared to be responsible. Infe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The infection frequency in this series was 9% (60 infections in 673 patients) and is similar to previous reports [2,4,6,7,10,12,13]. Lord et al [6] reported a 11.7% infection rate (33 infections in 283 patients); their series did not differ with regard to age, sex, type of allograft, or site of the allograft.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The infection frequency in this series was 9% (60 infections in 673 patients) and is similar to previous reports [2,4,6,7,10,12,13]. Lord et al [6] reported a 11.7% infection rate (33 infections in 283 patients); their series did not differ with regard to age, sex, type of allograft, or site of the allograft.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the present series, 18% of the infected patients (11 of 60 patients) were successfully treated with surgical débride-ment and antibiotics without removal of the allograft, and the percent is similar to other reports (Lord et al 14% [6] and Loty et al 14% [7]). Of the 49 patients (82%, 49 of 60 infections), in which the allograft was removed and a temporary cement spacer with antibiotic was implanted to control the infection, only 41 were secondary reconstructed (68%, 41 of 60 infected patients) with another bone allograft in 24 and an endoprosthesis in 17.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations