2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection of surgical wounds in the maxillofacial region and free flap donor sites with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most commonly isolated pathogens from theatre and on the ward while Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli and coagulase negative Staphylococcus were commonly isolated from patients recovering in the wards. Patients who were septic before coming to hospital had more complications from infection as observed in this study, also in similar studies (Avery et al, 2006;Isibor et al, 2008). Isolates from pus obtained during surgery were mainly Enterobacter sp and Pseudomonas sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most commonly isolated pathogens from theatre and on the ward while Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli and coagulase negative Staphylococcus were commonly isolated from patients recovering in the wards. Patients who were septic before coming to hospital had more complications from infection as observed in this study, also in similar studies (Avery et al, 2006;Isibor et al, 2008). Isolates from pus obtained during surgery were mainly Enterobacter sp and Pseudomonas sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Published data regarding the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in the surgical treatment of maxillofacial fractures is scarce, and the level of evidence is low (Martin et al, 2003;Andreasen et al, 2006). In our series 97% (75/77) of patients who received implants also received antibiotic prophylaxis, of which, one patient went on to (Avery et al, 2006). In our series, 74% (99/134) of patients received perioperative antibiotics, and of those, 13% (13/99) received a prolonged course Tables 2 and 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The duration of hospital admission with the PPM flap and free tissue transfer are similar. The long mean duration of admission and high incidence of reoperation reported by O'Neill et al (Ireland) 16 with the radial (34.3 days) and PPM flap (29.6 days) are unusually prolonged compared with other recent reports (radial 18-24 days and PPM flap 23-25 days) 15,25,45 and the Leicester experience (free tissue 20 days and PPM flap 21 days) 51 . Shorter admissions with the PPM flap have been described (9 and 10 days) 30,34,52 and duration varies with procedure (7.5 days primary reconstruction and 20 days salvage reconstruction) 36 .…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Conservative wound care procedures are common (10-50%) 16,33,34,38,60 but major secondary surgery infrequent (2-5%) 4,28,34,35,38,69 . In the Leicester study, a reduction in complications coincided with a reduced incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 38,51 and possibly increasing surgical experience 48,60 . Donor site complications are usually minor and occur in 4-6% 28,35,76 .…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%