2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection prevention and care bundles addressing health care-associated infections in neonatal care in low-middle income countries: a scoping review

Abstract: Background Health care-associated infections (HCAI) in neonatal units in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) are a major cause of mortality. This scoping review aimed to synthesise published literature on infection prevention and care bundles addressing neonatal HCAI in LMICs and to construct a Classification Framework for their components (elements).Methods Five electronic databases were searched between January 2001 and July 2020. A mixed-methods approach was applied: qualitative content analysis was used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed this retrospective study to gain an insight into the diversity of GPB isolated from blood cultures, and we highlight the need for future genomic and epidemiological studies to uncover the true burden of GPB neonatal sepsis in LMICs. A recent review by Garcia et al, 2022 describe a “Paucity of [care] bundles and elements aimed at HCAI detection (4% of 295 elements)” and “barriers to strengthening laboratory capacity”[ 48 ] when addressing matters of infection control in neonatal care in LMICs, emphasising the need for surveillance studies also mirrored elsewhere [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed this retrospective study to gain an insight into the diversity of GPB isolated from blood cultures, and we highlight the need for future genomic and epidemiological studies to uncover the true burden of GPB neonatal sepsis in LMICs. A recent review by Garcia et al, 2022 describe a “Paucity of [care] bundles and elements aimed at HCAI detection (4% of 295 elements)” and “barriers to strengthening laboratory capacity”[ 48 ] when addressing matters of infection control in neonatal care in LMICs, emphasising the need for surveillance studies also mirrored elsewhere [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary prevention elements were well represented in studies of care bundle interventions in LMIC, although with bias towards specific devices (catheters and ventilators), whereas detection (secondary prevention) through screening and surveillance and tertiary prevention elements (case management, cohorting, antimicrobial stewardship) were less frequently evaluated. Implementation focused on provision of facilities and equipment, consistent with a lack of these in resource-limited settings 39. Conversely, in well-resourced settings, lapses in preventive measures, including inadequate disinfection of surfaces and shared equipment, combined with resource-related factors such as proximity of cots and understaffing during periods of high demand, have been linked to cross-infection in neonatal units 40.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 38 A recent scoping review of neonatal healthcare-associated infection prevention and care bundles in LMIC proposed a ‘3+I’ framework comprising (1) primary prevention, (2) detection, (3) case management, plus (I) implementation. 39 Primary prevention elements were well represented in studies of care bundle interventions in LMIC, although with bias towards specific devices (catheters and ventilators), whereas detection (secondary prevention) through screening and surveillance and tertiary prevention elements (case management, cohorting, antimicrobial stewardship) were less frequently evaluated. Implementation focused on provision of facilities and equipment, consistent with a lack of these in resource-limited settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care-bundle approach has shown to improve practices in infection control [12] and antimicrobial stewardship [13] however, evidence on the impact of various diagnostic stewardship interventions is limited [14]. Our intent while designing the bundle was to affect processes which can minimize delays in clinical reporting of aBCD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%