2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-01916-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection prevention practices among EBMT hematopoietic cell transplant centers: the EBMT Infectious Disease Working Party survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another systematic review of patients with cancer and stem cell transplantation recipients, FQ prophylaxis reduced bacteremia but did not significantly reduce overall mortality 28 . A very recent survey about infection prevention practices among EBMT hematopoietic transplant centers 29 reported a little higher percentage of 66 and 72%—compared to our survey—of routine prophylaxis in the neutropenic phase after autologous and allogeneic transplantation, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In another systematic review of patients with cancer and stem cell transplantation recipients, FQ prophylaxis reduced bacteremia but did not significantly reduce overall mortality 28 . A very recent survey about infection prevention practices among EBMT hematopoietic transplant centers 29 reported a little higher percentage of 66 and 72%—compared to our survey—of routine prophylaxis in the neutropenic phase after autologous and allogeneic transplantation, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…10,11 Infections are reported as the primary cause of death in 7%-15% of autologous patients and 17%-25% of allogeneic HCT recipients. 5,[7][8][9] The immunosuppressive nature of the conditioning regimen in both autologous and allogenic regimens cause a period of neutropenia in the recipient which is a window for opportunistic pathogens (Table 1). Autologous HCT recipients generally have a shorter period of neutropenia due to the widespread use of granulocyte stimulating factors and the infusion of their own stem cells, without the need for immunosuppressive agents.…”
Section: Autologous Versus Allogeneic Hctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An allogenic HCT recipient similarly receives a potent conditioning regimen, followed by the administration of donor stem cells to restore normal haematopoiesis and in some cases treat malignancy 10,11 . Infections are reported as the primary cause of death in 7%–15% of autologous patients and 17%–25% of allogeneic HCT recipients 5,7–9 . The immunosuppressive nature of the conditioning regimen in both autologous and allogenic regimens cause a period of neutropenia in the recipient which is a window for opportunistic pathogens (Table 1).…”
Section: Autologous Versus Allogeneic Hctmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations