2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection Rate and Risk Factors in Patients Treated With Azacitidine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, infection occurred as an adverse event of AZA in 53% of these patients. The incidence of infection in our cohort was higher than that of non‐HSCT patients receiving AZA previously reported, presumably because grade 3‐4 neutropenia occurred in almost all of our patients. Although AZA is generally thought to have low toxicity, pancytopenia occurred often in patients after HSCT; it is therefore mandatory that we appropriately manage infectious diseases, particularly in patients with long‐term neutropenia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…However, infection occurred as an adverse event of AZA in 53% of these patients. The incidence of infection in our cohort was higher than that of non‐HSCT patients receiving AZA previously reported, presumably because grade 3‐4 neutropenia occurred in almost all of our patients. Although AZA is generally thought to have low toxicity, pancytopenia occurred often in patients after HSCT; it is therefore mandatory that we appropriately manage infectious diseases, particularly in patients with long‐term neutropenia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Prospective azacitidine trials in MDS/AML did not address the risk of IFI, although they suggested that azacitidine reduced the overall number of infectious events requiring antimicrobials compared with that of the conventional treatment regimens . Some subsequent retrospective reports have described low overall patterns of infection in such patients . One of them found a significantly higher incidence of IFI in patients receiving azacitidine following prior intensive chemotherapy compared to frontline (5/20, 25% vs. 1/44, 2.7%; P = 0.038).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of prophylactic antibiotics in the setting of AML and LITR has not been studied in a clinical investigation, notwithstanding suggestions made by AGIHO (German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology). Current research on LITR treatment shows that regular prophylactic antibiotics are not given to these individuals [ [26] , [27] , [28] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%