2003
DOI: 10.1309/mlufx0hr5b96gvax
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infectious Diseases Detected at Autopsy at an Urban Public Hospital, 1996–2001

Abstract: Previous studies have demonstrated significant discrepancy rates between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. However, infectious diseases have not received emphasis in these studies. We conducted a study to determine whether the clinical and autopsy diagnoses of infectious diseases are concordant or discrepant and to determine discrepancy rates. Retrospective reviews of the records of 276 patients (adults, 182; fetuses and neonates, 94) who underwent autopsy during the years 1996 through 2001 were performed. Compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Infection or inflammation was found in 48% of cases. 22 From the cases with infection or inflammation, 42% of them had a relevant clinical history, whereas 58% had no history. The most frequent diagnosis was chorioamnionitis.…”
Section: Fetal Inflammatory Response and Perinatal Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection or inflammation was found in 48% of cases. 22 From the cases with infection or inflammation, 42% of them had a relevant clinical history, whereas 58% had no history. The most frequent diagnosis was chorioamnionitis.…”
Section: Fetal Inflammatory Response and Perinatal Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from two other studies on the prevalence of pneumonia in autopsies were similar to those of the present study, ranging from 21.8% to 29.5%. (9,10) In the elderly, infectious pneumonitis was found in 40.6% of the autopsied cases, (11) and, in a study on ventilator-associated pneumonia, (12) it was reported that NP (identified in autopsies) accounted for 60% of the deaths due to nosocomial infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recognized efficacy of autopsy as a tool for medical education and as a method for the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in general, (23) the reduction in autopsy rates is a phenomenon observed worldwide, (9)(10)(11)(23)(24)(25) possibly due to the interaction of a number of factors, such as the development of sensitive diagnostic methods, which reduce the need for autopsy to investigate the cause of death; the aging of the population, which makes death be interpreted as a natural part of the process; a lack of interest on the part of the team of professionals, who question the validity of the procedure; the fear of assigning blame to the physician in charge; and the idea that autopsy findings can set a precedent for filing a medical malpractice lawsuit. (9,11,25) Consequently, autopsy studies have become scarce in the literature, and the potential of autopsies for diagnosis, medical education and evaluation of the quality of diagnosis has been minimized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations