Infectious Diseases Resources for the iPhone

Oehler, Richard L.; Smith, Kevin A.; Toney, John F.

doi:10.1086/651602

Cited by 76 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Smartphones house the latest medical references, provide access to patients' medical records and imaging studies, can photograph or video physical findings, and educate and monitor patients. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Smartphones can facilitate information transfer in the medical setting and may improve housestaff efficiency and communication. 9 Despite their significant benefits, smartphones introduce another source of interruption, multitasking, and distraction into the hospital environment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 These devices have been used for teleconsultation 3 and patient education, 4 and applications have been developed for numerous clinical specialties. [4][5][6][7][8] Housestaff perceive that communication improves when they use smartphones rather than traditional pagers on the inpatient service, 9 and patients may have a positive view of physicians' use of handheld computers. 10 Medical schools and residency programs are increasingly requiring smartphone ownership for their trainees, with the expectation that smartphone use will enhance the educational experience, ensure the highest level of patient care, improve user efficiency, and help control the costs associated with purchasing updated textbooks.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds: Prevalence, patterns and potential for distraction

Katz‐Sidlow

Ludwig

Miller

et al. 2012

Journal of Hospital Medicine

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND:While there are numerous benefits of smartphone use for physicians, little is known about the negative effects of using these devices in the context of patient care.OBJECTIVE:To assess resident and faculty smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds and its potential as a source of distraction during transfer of clinical information.DESIGN:Cross‐sectional survey.SETTING:University‐affiliated public teaching hospital.PARTICIPANTS:All housestaff and inpatient faculty in the departments of Medicine and Pediatrics.METHODS:Participants were asked about smartphone ownership, usage patterns during attending rounds, and whether team members had ever missed important data during rounds due to distraction from smartphones. Attendings were asked whether policies should be established for smartphone use during rounds.RESULTS:The overall response rate was 73%. Device ownership was prevalent (89% residents, 98% faculty), as was use of smartphones during inpatient rounds (57% residents, 28% attendings). According to self‐reports, smartphones were used during rounds for patient care (85% residents, 48% faculty), reading/responding to personal texts/e‐mails (37% residents, 12% faculty), and other non‐patient care uses (15% residents, 0% faculty). Nineteen percent of residents and 12% of attendings believed they had missed important information because of distraction from smartphones. Residents and faculty agreed that smartphones “can be a serious distraction during attending rounds,” and nearly 80% of faculty believed that smartphone policies should be established.CONCLUSIONS:Smartphone use during attending rounds is prevalent and can distract users during important information transfer. Attendings strongly favored the institution of formal policies governing appropriate smartphone use during inpatient rounds. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2012;. © 2012 Society of Hospital Medicine

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds: Prevalence, patterns and potential for distraction

Katz‐Sidlow

Ludwig

Miller

et al. 2012

Journal of Hospital Medicine

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 Communication between medical staff and hospitals has also been facilitated greatly with the use of 'push email' and notifications; in addition to certain hospitals integrating paging systems with smartphone notifications. 6 With the advent of custom designed applications, smartphone use has rapidly expanded and a number of specialties are producing innovative applications relevant to their own specialty, such as orthopedic decision support applications, 7 offsite radiology access, 8,9 anesthetic techniques, 10 or infectious disease physicians tracking epidemics, 11 to name a few. Smartphones have enabled volumes of medical literature and reference material to be accessible to students and clinicians in the palm of their hand.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Eye Phone Study: reliability and accuracy of assessing Snellen visual acuity using smartphone technology

Perera

Chakrabarti

Islam

et al. 2015

Eye

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Smartphone-based Snellen visual acuity charts has become popularized; however, their accuracy has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the equivalence of a smartphone-based visual acuity chart with a standard 6-m Snellen visual acuity (6SVA) chart. Methods First, a review of available Snellen chart applications on iPhone was performed to determine the most accurate application based on optotype size. Subsequently, a prospective comparative study was performed by measuring conventional 6SVA and then iPhone visual acuity using the 'Snellen' application on an Apple iPhone 4. Results Eleven applications were identified, with accuracy of optotype size ranging from 4.4-39.9%. Eighty-eight patients from general medical and surgical wards in a tertiary hospital took part in the second part of the study. The mean difference in logMAR visual acuity between the two charts was 0.02 logMAR (95% limit of agreement − 0.332, 0.372 logMAR). The largest mean difference in logMAR acuity was noted in the subgroup of patients with 6SVA worse than 6/18 (n = 5), who had a mean difference of two Snellen visual acuity lines between the charts (0.276 logMAR). Conclusion We did not identify a Snellen visual acuity app at the time of study, which could predict a patients standard Snellen visual acuity within one line. There was considerable variability in the optotype accuracy of apps. Further validation is required for assessment of acuity in patients with severe vision impairment.

show abstract

“…They also have larger number of applications including those designed for specific medical fields. 12,13 . Access to mobile phones is rapidly growing in Africa while internet facilities are also increasing with installation of multiple undersea fibre-optic cables 14 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of smartphones among medical students in the clinical years at a medical school in Sub-Sahara Africa: A pilot study

Ibrahim¹,

Salisu²,

Popoola³

et al. 2014

JournalMTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Smartphones help in quick access to medical information, enhance student learning in clinical environment and increase their knowledge score. We conducted a pilot study of medical students in the clinical years to assess their current utilization of mobile phones, the perceived advantages and barriers.Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 5 th and 6 th year medical students using a pre-tested questionnaire was conducted. Information gathered were bio-data, type of mobile phone owned, usage pattern in terms of frequency and applications, perceived advantages and barriers. Data was analysed employing SPSS version 15.Results: All the 123 participants owned smartphones and the greatest use among majority (!63%) was for routine functions such as receiving or making calls, sending or receiving SMS and e-mails, as schedule/calendar/planner and as dictionary. Less frequent usage (41% to 59%) was to access and take lecture notes, access medical videos, electronic textbook and for medical research. They were rarely used (B32%) as clinical tools in patient management, for course evaluation and as log book. Battery life, small size screen, slow speed, limited memory and cost were the major barriers to mobile learning while the greatest advantages were mobility of the device, ease of use, access to current information and ease of access to resources.Conclusions: Our medical students appeared comfortable with the use of smartphones for routine personal applications, searching academic resources as well as accessing and taking lecture notes without institutional assistance. With minimal support, they could be encouraged to use their mobile phones for greater education activities and accessing clinical materials.

show abstract

Infectious Diseases Resources for the iPhone

Cited by 76 publications

References 1 publication

Smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds: Prevalence, patterns and potential for distraction

Smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds: Prevalence, patterns and potential for distraction

The Eye Phone Study: reliability and accuracy of assessing Snellen visual acuity using smartphone technology

Use of smartphones among medical students in the clinical years at a medical school in Sub-Sahara Africa: A pilot study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About