2011
DOI: 10.1890/10-2433.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference about density and temporary emigration in unmarked populations

Abstract: Abstract. Few species are distributed uniformly in space, and populations of mobile organisms are rarely closed with respect to movement, yet many models of density rely upon these assumptions. We present a hierarchical model allowing inference about the density of unmarked populations subject to temporary emigration and imperfect detection. The model can be fit to data collected using a variety of standard survey methods such as repeated point counts in which removal sampling, double-observer sampling, or dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
263
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
263
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We used generalized binomial N-mixture models for repeated count data with negative binomial distributions to Avian Conservation and Ecology 11(2): 3 http://www.ace-eco.org/vol11/iss2/art3/ simultaneously evaluate covariates potentially related to abundance, availability, and detectability (Royle 2004, Chandler et al 2011). The models consisted of three hierarchical levels: one described the total number of individuals that potentially use habitats around each station, referred to here as the abundance process; another described the proportion of total individuals present within plots during surveys, referred to here as the availability process; and another described the proportion of available individuals observed during surveys, referred to here as the detectability process (Chandler et al 2011). We chose a negative binomial distribution because models with this distribution had lower Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) values for each species compared with models using a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used generalized binomial N-mixture models for repeated count data with negative binomial distributions to Avian Conservation and Ecology 11(2): 3 http://www.ace-eco.org/vol11/iss2/art3/ simultaneously evaluate covariates potentially related to abundance, availability, and detectability (Royle 2004, Chandler et al 2011). The models consisted of three hierarchical levels: one described the total number of individuals that potentially use habitats around each station, referred to here as the abundance process; another described the proportion of total individuals present within plots during surveys, referred to here as the availability process; and another described the proportion of available individuals observed during surveys, referred to here as the detectability process (Chandler et al 2011). We chose a negative binomial distribution because models with this distribution had lower Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) values for each species compared with models using a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate model convergence and comparison of estimates across variables and species, we z-transformed all of the covariates prior to analysis (Kéry and Chandler 2012). Models were fitted using the gpcount function in the package unmarked (Chandler et al 2011.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional approaches to abundance estimation based on line transect distance sampling do not permit modeling abundance as a function of environmental covariates that can affect both spatial distribution pattern and population density. To this end, it is encouraging to note that modeling approaches such as the hierarchical modeling framework of Royle et al (2004), and its extension to allow temporary emigration (Chandler et al, 2011), will prove useful to improve accuracy and precision of density estimates and statistical inference regarding covariate effects on density. Finally, the availability of software packages such as unmarked (Fiske et al, 2012) will facilitate the implementation of recently developed density estimation and modeling approaches using data collected from distance sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance sampling data were analyzed using the gdistsamp function based on the method proposed by Royle et al (2004) and extended by Chandler et al (2011). This model is similar to the N-mixture model, although it adds a component to the likelihood to address variability in detection probability as a function of range from the survey transect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%