2021
DOI: 10.3390/e23091099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference for Inverse Power Lomax Distribution with Progressive First-Failure Censoring

Abstract: This paper investigates the statistical inference of inverse power Lomax distribution parameters under progressive first-failure censored samples. The maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) and the asymptotic confidence intervals are derived based on the iterative procedure and asymptotic normality theory of MLEs, respectively. Bayesian estimates of the parameters under squared error loss and generalized entropy loss function are obtained using independent gamma priors. For Bayesian computation, Tierney–Kadane’s … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, Wu and Kuş [8] introduced life testing, which combines first-failure censoring with progressive type-II censoring, namely as a progressive first-failure censoring (PFFC) scheme. Several authors have discussed inference under a PFFC scheme for different lifetime distributions; see, for example, Haj et al [9], Abushal [10], Soliman et al [11,12], Mahmoud et al [13], Ahmed [14], Xie and Gui [15] and Shi and Shi [16]. This censoring scheme has advantages in terms of reducing test time in which more items are used but only m of n × k items are failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, Wu and Kuş [8] introduced life testing, which combines first-failure censoring with progressive type-II censoring, namely as a progressive first-failure censoring (PFFC) scheme. Several authors have discussed inference under a PFFC scheme for different lifetime distributions; see, for example, Haj et al [9], Abushal [10], Soliman et al [11,12], Mahmoud et al [13], Ahmed [14], Xie and Gui [15] and Shi and Shi [16]. This censoring scheme has advantages in terms of reducing test time in which more items are used but only m of n × k items are failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ashour et al [7] studied both Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimations for the Weibull parameters using binomial random removals. Shi and Shi [8] considered an inference for the inverse power Lomax distribution. See also, for further information, the works of Xie and Gui [9], Saini et al [10] and Cai and Gui [11], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%