2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2010.00724.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference on 3D Procrustes Means: Tree Bole Growth, Rank Deficient Diffusion Tensors and Perturbation Models

Abstract: The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) for extrinsic and intrinsic means on manifolds is extended to a generalization of Fréchet means. Examples are the Procrustes mean for 3D Kendall shapes as well as a mean introduced by Ziezold. This allows for one-sample tests previously not possible, and to numerically assess the 'inconsistency of the Procrustes mean' for a perturbation model and 'inconsistency' within a model recently proposed for diffusion tensor imaging. Also it is shown that the CLT can be extended to mildly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is often called a perturbation model (Goodall, 1991). It is wellknown that a perturbation model introduces a bias in the estimation of the geodesic mean unless the distribution is isotropic (Kent and Mardia, 1997;Le, 1998;Huckemann, 2011a). In this paper in Section 4, we use the von Mises-Fisher distribution and in Section 5 the perturbation model.…”
Section: Rigid Rotation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is often called a perturbation model (Goodall, 1991). It is wellknown that a perturbation model introduces a bias in the estimation of the geodesic mean unless the distribution is isotropic (Kent and Mardia, 1997;Le, 1998;Huckemann, 2011a). In this paper in Section 4, we use the von Mises-Fisher distribution and in Section 5 the perturbation model.…”
Section: Rigid Rotation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuition from the Euclidean setting suggests that if the points are randomly sampled from a well-behaved probability distribution on a space M of dimension d + 1, then the random variable that is the barycenter ought not be confined to a particular subspace of dimension d or less, if the distribution is generic. While this intuition has been made rigorous when M is a manifold [5,12,14,15], it can fail when M has certain types of singularities, as we demonstrate here for an open book O: a space obtained by gluing disjoint copies of a half-space along their boundary hyperplanes; see Section 1 for precise definitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 are based on the distributions of suitable estimates As our growth model can be viewed as a perturbation (or generative) model, it is not clear that estimation via a Procrustes-type algorithm will recover the modelled 'true' anisotropic growth, at least asymptotically. In fact, it is well known from shape analysis that, under general error models, Procrustes means are usually inconsistent with centres of perturbation models; see Lele (1993), Le (1998), Kent and Mardia (1997), Huckemann (2011) and Devilliers et al (2017). Indeed, our simulations based on real distortions in Section 3.1 indicate towards minor inconsistency, namely that true anisotropic growth is slightly overestimated and this effect wanes with increased anisotropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%