2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.03164
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference on autoregulation in gene expression

Abstract: Some genes can promote or repress their own expressions, which is called autoregulation. In general, it is extremely difficult to determine the existence of autoregulation with direct biochemical approaches. Nevertheless, autoregulations reveal themselves in gene expression profiles. We prove some mathematical propositions. Based on these propositions, we develop some simple but robust mathematical methods that infer the existence of autoregulation from gene expression data. We also apply our methods to experi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both technical and biological noise, however, might result in significant deviations between cells of same state. The stochastic and dynamical modeling of gene regulation and splicing, compared with deterministic and steady-state approaches in spliceJAC, could in the future improve the goodness of fitting toward low-expressed genes and strengthen the inference of gene auto-regulations (preprint: Wang & He, 2022). Finally, like other models of gene regulation based on scRNA-seq data, spliceJAC assumes that mRNA counts provide a consistent approximation for protein copy numbers, which might not necessarily be true due to post-translations regulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both technical and biological noise, however, might result in significant deviations between cells of same state. The stochastic and dynamical modeling of gene regulation and splicing, compared with deterministic and steady-state approaches in spliceJAC, could in the future improve the goodness of fitting toward low-expressed genes and strengthen the inference of gene auto-regulations (preprint: Wang & He, 2022). Finally, like other models of gene regulation based on scRNA-seq data, spliceJAC assumes that mRNA counts provide a consistent approximation for protein copy numbers, which might not necessarily be true due to post-translations regulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain types of data can be used to infer the existence of gene autoregulation, such as time series data [48,71,51] or interventional data for single-cell gene expression [27]. There also exists an inference method that only requires one-time non-interventional single-cell gene expression data [57]. Although different inference methods are based on different types of models, and require different data types, the basic idea is the same: build two models, one with autoregulation, and one without autoregulation; then try to find different behaviors between these two models.…”
Section: Inference Methods For Autoregulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoregulation means for some fixed nī, h i (n) is (locally) increasing/decreasing with n i , thus f i (n) increases/decreases and/or g i (n) decreases/increases with n i . In this model, we have the following result [57]:…”
Section: Inference Methods For Autoregulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When studying the inference for mutual regulation, I also found an idea to infer the existence of autoregulation. In a Markov chain model of gene expression, if there is no autoregulation, then for the expression level, the variance should be larger than the mean [24]. Thus if the mean is larger than the variance, there might be autoregulation.…”
Section: Gene Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%