2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12559-013-9205-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference Through Embodied Simulation in Cognitive Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to direct geometric processing of perceptual and spatial information for reasoning and inference, the proposed framework looks at learning and formation of internal models / memories instead, that are then used to engage in a range of inferences related to feasibility and consequences of the actions of one self or the interacting partner. In this context, the computational approach is motivated by emerging evidence from neurosciences related to embodied simulation (Hesslow 2012;Gallese & Sinigaglia 2011;Mohan et al 2013) in particular: simulation of action: we are able to activate motor structures of the brain in a way that resembles activity during a normal action but does not cause any overt movement (Gallese & Sinigaglia 2011;Grafton 2009); simulation of perception: imagining perceiving something is actually similar to the perceiving it in reality, only di ffe rence be i ng that, the perceptual activity is generated by the brain itself rather than by external stimuli (Barsalou 2011;Grush 2004); anticipation: there exist associative mechanisms that enable both behavioural and perceptual activity to elicit other perceptual activity in the sensory areas of the brain. Most important, a simulated action can elicit perceptual activity that resembles the activity that would have occurred if the action had actually been performed (Barsalou 2011; Hesslow 2012).…”
Section: A Case For Coupled Memory Representations Of Body and Space mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to direct geometric processing of perceptual and spatial information for reasoning and inference, the proposed framework looks at learning and formation of internal models / memories instead, that are then used to engage in a range of inferences related to feasibility and consequences of the actions of one self or the interacting partner. In this context, the computational approach is motivated by emerging evidence from neurosciences related to embodied simulation (Hesslow 2012;Gallese & Sinigaglia 2011;Mohan et al 2013) in particular: simulation of action: we are able to activate motor structures of the brain in a way that resembles activity during a normal action but does not cause any overt movement (Gallese & Sinigaglia 2011;Grafton 2009); simulation of perception: imagining perceiving something is actually similar to the perceiving it in reality, only di ffe rence be i ng that, the perceptual activity is generated by the brain itself rather than by external stimuli (Barsalou 2011;Grush 2004); anticipation: there exist associative mechanisms that enable both behavioural and perceptual activity to elicit other perceptual activity in the sensory areas of the brain. Most important, a simulated action can elicit perceptual activity that resembles the activity that would have occurred if the action had actually been performed (Barsalou 2011; Hesslow 2012).…”
Section: A Case For Coupled Memory Representations Of Body and Space mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The episodic memory model to encode multiple sensorimotor experiences of iCub or the resulting bottom-up activations in hubs and the rewards acquired through time, is realized using a recently proposed neural framework for organization of memory in iCub (Mohan et al 2013) that builds up on an excitatory-inhibitory neural network of auto-associative memory (Hopfield 2008). For modeling purposes, the memory network is dealt as a small patch in the sheet-like neocortex, consi sting of 1000 pyramidal cells (N=1000).…”
Section: Representation Of An Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the bottom is the sensory layer to analyse properties of the objects; in particular colour, shape, size and weight. Word information is an additional input coming from the teacher either to issue user goals or teach names of new objects [ 45 ]. Information coming from the sensory layer is projected bottom-up to a set of growing self-organizing maps (SOMs [ 39 ]), organized in a property-specific fashion.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Results of perceptual analysis activate various neural maps (property-specific SOMs in layer 1), ultimately leading to a distributed representation of the perceived object in the connector hub. (Interested readers may refer to Mohan, Morasso, Sandini, & Kasderidis, 2013, for a detailed description of the sensorimotor organization and learning). The kind of distributed property-specific organization and global integration through hubs is in line with emerging results from neuroscience discussed in section 1.1.…”
Section: The Icub Humanoid and The Underlying The Perception-actionmentioning
confidence: 99%