2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior branch–preserving superior head resection of the pancreas with gastric wall–covering method for intraductal papillary mucinous adenoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study differ from those of other investigators' reports, which have indicated that branch duct type IPMN, especially smaller than 30 mm in size, is sufficient cause to apply limited resection of the pancreas (8, 19-21). Only 12 of 32 patients with main duct involvement had cysts larger than 30 mm in size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the present study differ from those of other investigators' reports, which have indicated that branch duct type IPMN, especially smaller than 30 mm in size, is sufficient cause to apply limited resection of the pancreas (8, 19-21). Only 12 of 32 patients with main duct involvement had cysts larger than 30 mm in size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have suggested that limited resection would be applied in branch duct type IPMNs [12][13][14][15]. Our results support this suggestion to some extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This suggests that simple cystic excision including enucleation could be unsafe due to the risk of tumoral involvement of the main duct. At the least, segmental resection of the pancreas is recommended for main duct involvement communicating with branch duct type IPMN [12][13][14]. Most series to date have only given suggestions whether to operate or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous report described that intraoperative pancreatography using an endoscopic naso‐pancreatic drainage (ENPD) tube was useful for identifying the pancreatic ducts to be dissected and for preventing injury to the main pancreatic duct during open enucleation of pancreatic insulinoma . In addition, the ENPD tube in the main pancreatic duct was clearly and easily detected by intraoperative ultrasonography, and thus both the direction and position of the main pancreatic duct were correctly identified.…”
Section: Laparoscopic Enucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%