Imperfect information and inattention to energy costs are importantA fundamental assumption in traditional policy analysis is that people's choices identify their true preferences. In practice, however, many policies are at least partially predicated on the idea that consumers' choices may not maximize their own welfare. Examples include consumer financial protection, taxes and bans on drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, and unhealthy foods, and subsidies and mandates for energy-efficient products. To evaluate such policies, it is necessary to extend traditional public finance analysis to allow for the possibility of consumer mistakes and to design empirical strategies that identify the necessary economic and psychological parameters. This paper carries this out in the context of energy efficiency policy.