2020
DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2020000149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior vena cava filters: a framework for evidence-based use

Abstract: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Although most patients can be managed safely with anticoagulation, inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) represent an important alternative to anticoagulation in a small subset of patients. IVCF use has expanded exponentially with the advent of retrievable filters. Indications for IVCFs have liberalized despite limited evidence supporting this practice. Because indiscriminate use of IVCFs can be associated with net patient harm, knowledge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IVC filter placement can also mitigate some risk; however, placement is not without risk 37–43. As such, this is a controversial topic that needs further investigation in this population as treatment options vary widely in the literature 44–49. The granularity of our data presented a unique opportunity to demonstrate that patients receiving lower doses of anticoagulation/antiplatelet medications had an overall higher incidence of VTE events, all while not having any major bleeding complications in the fully anticoagulated cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…IVC filter placement can also mitigate some risk; however, placement is not without risk 37–43. As such, this is a controversial topic that needs further investigation in this population as treatment options vary widely in the literature 44–49. The granularity of our data presented a unique opportunity to demonstrate that patients receiving lower doses of anticoagulation/antiplatelet medications had an overall higher incidence of VTE events, all while not having any major bleeding complications in the fully anticoagulated cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…16,17 Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters should be reserved for patients with acute PE who have contraindications to anticoagulation. 18 Under particular and challenging circumstances, such as in those with a history of multiple recurrent VTE despite being adequately anticoagulated, IVC filters may also be considered. 18 PERTs may be helpful in deciding which patients may benefit from advanced therapies by balancing the paucity of robust studies with technological advancements with multiple endovascular devices that could potentially be useful in appropriately selected patients.…”
Section: S Truc Ture Fun C Tion and R Ati Onale For Pertsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Under particular and challenging circumstances, such as in those with a history of multiple recurrent VTE despite being adequately anticoagulated, IVC filters may also be considered. 18 PERTs may be helpful in deciding which patients may benefit from advanced therapies by balancing the paucity of robust studies with technological advancements with multiple endovascular devices that could potentially be useful in appropriately selected patients. Figure 2 illustrates PERT indicators for activation and guides potential therapeutic options for patients with acute complex PE.…”
Section: S Truc Ture Fun C Tion and R Ati Onale For Pertsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Inferior vena cava filtration is most likely to benefit patients at high risk (presence of caval thrombus or free-floating thrombus image during venography) of iatrogenic pulmonary embolism during endovenous intervention. 3,4 Finally, it is mentioned that five patients have current cancer diagnosis. Have the life expectancy of these patients been taken into consideration while planning the intervention?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%