2010
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03882.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: who is responsible for their removal?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful retrieval of filters has been reported up to 317 days after insertion 4 . As in the case described by Baschera et al, 1 it is not uncommon to find a clot in the filter at the time of attempted retrieval, for which multiple causes have been proposed 5 . In this situation, it is our practice to rebook patients for a repeat cavogram and second retrieval attempt after therapeutic anticoagulation for 1–2 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Successful retrieval of filters has been reported up to 317 days after insertion 4 . As in the case described by Baschera et al, 1 it is not uncommon to find a clot in the filter at the time of attempted retrieval, for which multiple causes have been proposed 5 . In this situation, it is our practice to rebook patients for a repeat cavogram and second retrieval attempt after therapeutic anticoagulation for 1–2 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…T o the Editor: We read with interest the letter by Baschera et al 1 regarding the retrieval of non‐permanent inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in trauma patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%