2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0049-3848(16)30112-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior vena cava filters in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE): patterns of use and outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 1990s, the use of IVC filters has increased markedly, despite limited evidence of their efficacy. To date, the only universal recommendation for IVC filters is for acute treatment of proximal DVT or PE in patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulation . Randomized trials assessing outcomes of IVC filter placement that only included patients who also were treated with anticoagulants did not find a clear benefit .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1990s, the use of IVC filters has increased markedly, despite limited evidence of their efficacy. To date, the only universal recommendation for IVC filters is for acute treatment of proximal DVT or PE in patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulation . Randomized trials assessing outcomes of IVC filter placement that only included patients who also were treated with anticoagulants did not find a clear benefit .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an observational study of 2747 cancer patients who had an IVC filter placed between 2005 and 2009, no reduction in short-term mortality or PE prevention was demonstrated. 59 Other than the possible exception of a patient with recent acute VTE AND a contraindication for anticoagulant therapy, we do not think the evidence of benefit from IVC filters justifies their risk.…”
Section: Patients With Thrombocytopeniamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The study showed no benefit for short-term mortality (30-day) and no reduction in recurrent PE. However, it reported a 60% increased risk of DVT [42]. This high rate of DVT in the setting of IVC insertion is reflective of the persistently heightened prothrombotic state in cancer patients, which is not suppressed by IVC filters.…”
Section: Ivc Filter For Acute Cancer-associated Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 97%