Inferred respect: a critical ingredient in customer satisfaction

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to address the following question: Do consumer inferences of respect (disrespect) contribute to satisfaction (dissatisfaction)? The research question is explored over two studies. The first aimed to test whether respect spontaneously emerged as an important component of consumer satisfaction. The second aimed to examine whether perceptions of respect could explain consumers’ satisfaction response beyond traditional antecedents of satisfaction (i.e. product and service factors, expectations). Design/methodology/approach The first (pilot) study examined whether respect/disrespect spontaneously emerged in written descriptions of highly satisfactory/dissatisfactory experiences (n = 356). The second (main) study used a survey methodology to test whether perceptions of respect could explain customer satisfaction beyond traditional antecedents (n = 2,641 plus n = 398). Findings Drawing on theories from social psychology and organizational justice, the current study argues that perceived respect, as inferred by customers from elements of their interactions with organizations, may also be critically involved in the satisfaction response. Research limitations/implications Conceptually, the findings place respect as a central antecedent among satisfaction determinants. Practical implications Practically, this research underscores the importance of enacting respect and avoiding actions that communicate disrespect because of their effect on satisfaction. Originality/value Customer satisfaction is critically important to organizations and so a great deal of research or work has sought to understand its causes – traditionally product performance, service quality and expectations. This current work, or This current research argues that inferred respect, as an indicator of the extent to which people perceive they are valued, should have an important, and general, influence on satisfaction that goes beyond what traditional determinants of satisfaction can explain.

When unethical practices harm relationship outcomes: testing the influence of consumer-perceived unethical behaviour on trust and satisfaction in the banking sector

“…, 2021). The presence of disrespectful behaviours thus leads to a dissolution of the commercial exchange as it harms reciprocal social interactions (Ashworth and Bourassa, 2020). This means that even if consumers go into the bank with money issues, they cannot accept being disrespected, even if their other money issues are unaffected.…”

Digital exchange compromises: Teetering priorities of consumers and organizations at the iron triangle

“…Cooperation lies at the heart of marketing as it promotes more efficient marketing systems and a better understanding of exchange partners (Mittelstaedt et al, 2006). In essence, cooperation requires respect; it requires empathy among exchange partners, a clear understanding of the needs and wants of the other, and a view of the world from the perspective of the other (Ashworth & Bourassa, 2020). An important challenge for future research on digital compromise is identifying ways to encourage shared norms of reciprocity through cooperation and respect.…”

Consumer anticipation as a performative experience

“…An important research stream has adopted a (dis)satisfaction approach to the relationship between pre- and post-consumption stages: expectancy disconfirmation theory (EDT) posits that (dis)satisfaction arises from discrepancies between pre-consumption expectations and subsequent perceptions of performance (Ashworth and Bourassa, 2020; Homburg et al , 2006; Oliver, 1980). Citing EDT, Chan and Mukhopadhyay (2010, p. 506) suggest that encouraging anticipation “may ironically not be the wisest strategy for marketers to follow” where expectations are raised that cannot be fulfilled.…”