2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-021-01528-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Bias and Uncertainty in Camera Calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before hand-eye calibration, the camera needs to be calibrated internally [6]. In this study, Halcon's algorithm is used to calibrate the camera internal reference, so the calibration board used in Halcon's official routine is also used.…”
Section: Internal Reference Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before hand-eye calibration, the camera needs to be calibrated internally [6]. In this study, Halcon's algorithm is used to calibrate the camera internal reference, so the calibration board used in Halcon's official routine is also used.…”
Section: Internal Reference Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of calibration is to obtain a mapping model between the target that is in three-dimensional coordinate space and the two-dimensional image [22]. Essentially, the internal parameters, external parameters, and distortion coefficients that are obtained through this calibration are the basis of the image correction, parameter inversion, and three-dimensional reconstruction.…”
Section: Stereo Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High values may indicate large systematic errors or inaccurate calibration. Nevertheless, they cannot give a complete information about the quality of the calibration [ 32 ]. Some camera calibration software packages, such as those implemented in Matlab [ 33 ] or OpenCV [ 34 ], also calculate the expanded uncertainty of both interior and exterior camera parameters based in Zhang’s method [ 6 ] for a 95% confidence level, assuming they follow a normal probability distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of camera calibration using the software mentioned above should be interpreted with caution for the following reasons: The method of estimating parameter uncertainties leads to the assumption that the model is linear, when, in fact, it is highly non-linear. Although there are studies dedicated to the analysis of the uncertainty of camera parameters [ 31 , 32 , 36 , 37 ], none of them have verified the hypothesis of normality of the calibrated parameters. The accuracy of the parameters with these software has not been verified with a suitable alternative method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation