Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2001
DOI: 10.1145/359784.360310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring calendar event attendance

Abstract: The digital personal calendar has long been established as an effective tool for supporting workgroup coordination. For the new class of ubiquitous computing applications, however, the calendar can also be seen as a sensor, providing both location and availability information to these applications. In most cases, however, the calendar represents a sequence of events that people could (or should) attend, not their actual daily activities. To assist in the accurate determination of user whereabouts and availabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some works using different platform are noteworthy in relation to the topic this paper. Mynatt and Tullio (2001) created a program that is perhaps most similar to our project.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some works using different platform are noteworthy in relation to the topic this paper. Mynatt and Tullio (2001) created a program that is perhaps most similar to our project.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors "the priority of an event is influenced by a number of factors, including the alarm status, recurrence status, the type of the event, and the user's role in the event" (Mynatt and Tullio 2001). These factors were collected from informal interviews with potential users.…”
Section: Work Determining the Factors Affecting Attendancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work by Palen [16] as well as work she performed with Grudin [7,17] examined electronic calendar use at two large companies, finding that workers often browsed their colleagues' calendars to infer where they might be and when they might return to their offices. Mynatt and Tullio observe that if two coworkers share some events on their calendars, one of them can wait until one of those shared events takes place to "ambush" the other for an informal chat [15]. When a calendar includes conflicting events or infrequently attended events, however, its value as a reliable predictor of a person's true schedule is weakened.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, groupware tools that are used to facilitate and mediate informal communication are less useful when people become increasingly mobile or have more flexible schedules. In response, researchers have undertaken projects that make use of new advances in activity sensing and machine intelligence to arrive at inferences about current or future availability and/or location [4,8,11,12,15]. In most cases, they are intended to foster better informal communication in the workplace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…location awareness: Groupware calendars have been useful tools to locate and track colleagues. Ambush [24] looked at calendar data to infer location and availability. It used a Bayesian model to predict the likelihood that a user would actually attend an event entered in his calendar.…”
Section: Sensors and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%