2023
DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2023.1298228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring connectivity of an oscillatory network via the phase dynamics reconstruction

Michael Rosenblum,
Arkady Pikovsky

Abstract: We review an approach for reconstructing oscillatory networks’ undirected and directed connectivity from data. The technique relies on inferring the phase dynamics model. The central assumption is that we observe the outputs of all network nodes. We distinguish between two cases. In the first one, the observed signals represent smooth oscillations, while in the second one, the data are pulse-like and can be viewed as point processes. For the first case, we discuss estimating the true phase from a scalar signal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter ansatz is often pursued in cases where a perturbation-based approach ( actio est reactio ) is either unfeasible or not constructive. Properties of an interaction can then be estimated with diverse linear and nonlinear, bi- and multivariate time-series-analysis techniques grounded in statistics ( Rodgers and Nicewander, 1988 ; Hamilton, 2020 ), nonlinear dynamics ( Kantz and Schreiber, 2003 ; Datseris and Parlitz, 2022 ), synchronization theory ( Arnhold et al, 1999 ; Pikovsky et al, 2001 ; Stankovski et al, 2012 ; Rosenblum and Pikovsky, 2023 ), statistical physics ( Tabar, 2019 ), and information theory ( Hlaváčková-Schindler et al, 2007 ), among others.…”
Section: Techniques To Assess and Characterize A Time-evolving Brain ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter ansatz is often pursued in cases where a perturbation-based approach ( actio est reactio ) is either unfeasible or not constructive. Properties of an interaction can then be estimated with diverse linear and nonlinear, bi- and multivariate time-series-analysis techniques grounded in statistics ( Rodgers and Nicewander, 1988 ; Hamilton, 2020 ), nonlinear dynamics ( Kantz and Schreiber, 2003 ; Datseris and Parlitz, 2022 ), synchronization theory ( Arnhold et al, 1999 ; Pikovsky et al, 2001 ; Stankovski et al, 2012 ; Rosenblum and Pikovsky, 2023 ), statistical physics ( Tabar, 2019 ), and information theory ( Hlaváčková-Schindler et al, 2007 ), among others.…”
Section: Techniques To Assess and Characterize A Time-evolving Brain ...mentioning
confidence: 99%