2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring extinctions II: A practical, iterative model based on records and surveys

Abstract: Extinctions are difficult to observe. Estimating the probability that a taxon has gone extinct using data from the field aids prioritisation of conservation interventions and environmental monitoring. There have been recent advances in approaches to estimating this probability from records. However, complete assessment requires consideration of the type, timing and certainty of records, the timing, scope and severity of threats, and the timing, extent and reliability of surveys. Until recently, no single metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Inaccessible Finch was most likely extinct by the late 1860s or early 1870s, and was probably the least numerous of the three extirpated species considered here. Our analyses support the conclusion that the Inaccessible Finch was extinct prior to the Challenger expedition in 1873 (Fisher et al 1969), though the search effort during that expedition was low compared to the potential available habitat, which would have influenced the probability that the finch would have been detected if it had still been extant, and therefore its estimated extinction date (Thompson et al 2017). Although the ultimate cause of this extinction remains unknown, it was probably driven by several concurrent pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Inaccessible Finch was most likely extinct by the late 1860s or early 1870s, and was probably the least numerous of the three extirpated species considered here. Our analyses support the conclusion that the Inaccessible Finch was extinct prior to the Challenger expedition in 1873 (Fisher et al 1969), though the search effort during that expedition was low compared to the potential available habitat, which would have influenced the probability that the finch would have been detected if it had still been extant, and therefore its estimated extinction date (Thompson et al 2017). Although the ultimate cause of this extinction remains unknown, it was probably driven by several concurrent pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Models were implemented using the R package spatExintct (Carlson et al 2018b), using integration increments of 0.001. Models that account for other aspects, such as detection probability and survey effort (Thompson et al 2017) were not considered here because of our desire to include uncertain records, and the lack of survey effort data with which to parameterize the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017; Thompson et al. 2017; IUCN 2020). These 11 were selected because they were well dispersed across the study area, represented a diversity of distributions (i.e., single site endemics vs. broad geographic ranges), and sufficient information was available to support assessment decisions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each taxon, data were compiled from Australian Virtual Herbarium records (CHAH, 2016), Conservation and Listing Advice, Recovery Plans, peer-reviewed literature, the assessments of Leigh et al (1984) and Briggs & Leigh (1996), and consultation with experts with field knowledge of species and habitats. Variables included the last date collected, survey effort and adequacy (Thompson et al, 2017), degree of habitat modification, intensity and extent of threats (Keith et al, 2017), detectability and life history of the species, and any taxonomic issues (Table 1). Taxa for which expert opinion or examination of specimens indicated they are morphologically close to co-occurring taxa and may not be taxonomically distinct were removed from further assessment, as were those whose occurrence in Australia is considered dubious.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they rely on an adequate sample size (typically considered to be > 5 records; Collen et al, 2010) and can seldom be applied to species with only one or two records, which is the case for many plants that are presumed extinct. Recent methodologies to estimate extinction probability have incorporated the timing and degree of threat, and a taxon's susceptibility (Keith et al, 2017), and record reliability and survey data (Thompson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%