2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-016-0324-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring extrinsic noise from single-cell gene expression data using approximate Bayesian computation

Abstract: Background: Gene expression is known to be an intrinsically stochastic process which can involve single-digit numbers of mRNA molecules in a cell at any given time. The modelling of such processes calls for the use of exact stochastic simulation methods, most notably the Gillespie algorithm. However, this stochasticity, also termed "intrinsic noise", does not account for all the variability between genetically identical cells growing in a homogeneous environment. Despite substantial experimental efforts, deter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the effect of red noise is a deterministic one and to get an accurate description of the system behaviour a full nonlinear, deterministic compartment model with generic (random) inflow parameters needs to be analysed. The red noise case is similar to models which assume a cell-to-cell variability where a parameter is perturbed by a constant, sampled from a given distribution [21,44]. In contrast to conventional Turing theory in which the inflow parameter is constant throughout the domain, our analysis indicates that randomly varying inflows across the domain might actually facilitate pattern formation.…”
Section: Power Law Noisementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, the effect of red noise is a deterministic one and to get an accurate description of the system behaviour a full nonlinear, deterministic compartment model with generic (random) inflow parameters needs to be analysed. The red noise case is similar to models which assume a cell-to-cell variability where a parameter is perturbed by a constant, sampled from a given distribution [21,44]. In contrast to conventional Turing theory in which the inflow parameter is constant throughout the domain, our analysis indicates that randomly varying inflows across the domain might actually facilitate pattern formation.…”
Section: Power Law Noisementioning
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand, Stumpf and his coworkers 23,27 proposed an approximate Bayesian computation scheme for inferring the parameter distributions, which was subsequently used in different biological systems. 17,28,29 In many of these studies, PDFs of all the parameters were estimated simultaneously. Or, the PDFs of only a subset of model parameters from the entire set were selected based on prior knowledge, and only these were estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gene expression, signal transduction, and multi-cellular systems (e.g. Lenive et al (2016); Picchini (2014); Imle et al (2019)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrarily, in likelihood-free methods, particularly ABC, it is easy to disregard any noise due to the unnecessity of even formulating a likelihood and the various inherent approximation levels, so that error sources can be difficult to pinpoint from the result. In the past, it has repeatedly not been included in ABC analyses (Toni et al, 2009;Lenive et al, 2016;Jagiella et al, 2017;Imle et al, 2019;Eriksson et al, 2019). Asymptotic unbiasedness of ABC is however granted only if the data-generation process is perfectly reproduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%