2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Functional Properties from Fluid Dynamics Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the anatomies considered in the present work originate from a reference CAD-based simplified model of the human nasal cavities, already introduced by Schillaci et al (2021), which lends itself to a simple geometrical parametrization. The use of simplified model geometries for the study of the flow in the human nasal cavities is not new: for example, Liu et al (2009) employed a model obtained by averaging together the CT scans of 30 patients.…”
Section: The Anatomiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the anatomies considered in the present work originate from a reference CAD-based simplified model of the human nasal cavities, already introduced by Schillaci et al (2021), which lends itself to a simple geometrical parametrization. The use of simplified model geometries for the study of the flow in the human nasal cavities is not new: for example, Liu et al (2009) employed a model obtained by averaging together the CT scans of 30 patients.…”
Section: The Anatomiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ML in fluid mechanics has recently seen a huge activity and recorded significant progresses (see e.g. the review by Vinuesa & Brunton 2022); however, very little information is available in the literature regarding the combined use of ML and CFD in rhinology, if exception is made for our own preliminary study (Schillaci et al 2021). The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in rhinology has been limited so far to classification of images derived from CT scans (Crowson et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset that we generate to train our GNN model is similar in terms of the geometries, meshing and CFD pipeline to the work of Thuerey et al (2020), the main differences being the chosen RANS model and the post-processing (graph parsing). Other datasets found in the literature focus only on the NACA family of airfoils (Schillaci et al, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%