2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2007.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring gene regulatory networks from temporal expression profiles under time-delay and noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model GRN modeling is considered as a non-linear identification problem with the presence of numerous interacting genes in the network (Cantone et al 2009;Kim et al 2007). A promising non-linear model, the S-system model (Savageau 1976) is capable of capturing the dynamics of various complex regulations.…”
Section: Stochastic Modeling Of Gene Regulatory Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model GRN modeling is considered as a non-linear identification problem with the presence of numerous interacting genes in the network (Cantone et al 2009;Kim et al 2007). A promising non-linear model, the S-system model (Savageau 1976) is capable of capturing the dynamics of various complex regulations.…”
Section: Stochastic Modeling Of Gene Regulatory Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Reverse-engineering algorithms based on ordinary di®erential equations yield directed graphs from time-series expression pro¯les. 20,21 1.3.2. Graphical models A graphical model describes the relationships among control and controlled genes as directed edges between nodes that represent the genes.…”
Section: Ordinary Di®erential Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longitudinal expression data usually contained few subjects sampled at multiple times, or more subjects sampled at only two times. As a result, the best solution of gene network inference was to assume stationarity in the expression data [12][13][14]; i.e., the interaction patterns among genes do not vary over time, although genes in reality interact dynamically. When the microarray technologies nowadays become cheaper and more popular, more studies are able to collect expression data of more subjects at multiple times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former describes the molecular kinetic reactions taking place in a cell, and the latter quantizes expression levels as binary variables that are linked to each other through logical relationships. The framework of dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) has merits over these approaches thanks to its capability of handling noisy expression measurements, modeling expression levels by continuous variables, and making prediction based on the inferred networks [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%